Some believe that people should make efforts to fight climate change, while others think it is better to learn to live with it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are a host of natural changes that mankind is not able to change or tackle, and they can be willing to reduce impact. Some people believe that people have to face natural changes. In my opinion, learning from it and live with improvement is a better way; my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why I would argue that get insights and make changes in life is more useful. Climate change is an automatic or natural process; no one can make changes such as stopping earthquakes; it’s preposterous. For changes in the atmosphere, a citizen could get erudition and learn from it. In other words, making changes in lifestyle season-wise is better than face predicaments like summer, monsoon, and winter, in addition, a host of people business related to natural changes.
On the other hand, fight to handle natural changes is hard and have risk and more consequences. For instance, attempting to tsunami, forge big shield and willing to restrict otters, high risk to civilization even deaths. However, in some natural disasters fighting spirits save lives and better. Furthermore, this way is also economically expensive.
To summarize, some feel that we have to find a way to handle atmosphere changes, while others argue that we ought to learn from climate change. I believe that learning from the past as well as studying and making changes in life is a better option than again nature.
Follow Us on IELTSFever Facebook