Some people say that no one should work after the age of 65 others say that they should continue the work as long as a want. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Sample 1 Some People Say That No One Should Work After the Age of 65 Others
There are differing opinions on whether people should work after the age of 65, with some arguing that retirement should be mandatory at this age, while others believe that individuals should have the freedom to continue working if they wish. This essay will discuss both views and provide my opinion on the matter.
On the one hand, proponents of mandatory retirement at 65 argue that it is necessary for both physical and mental well-being. As individuals grow older, their physical strength and cognitive abilities tend to decline, which may make it increasingly challenging for them to perform their job duties effectively. Moreover, retirement can provide an opportunity for seniors to enjoy their golden years, pursue hobbies, spend time with loved ones, and travel, all of which contribute to an improved quality of life. Additionally, by retiring at a fixed age, the job market may be opened up for younger generations, which can help to alleviate issues such as high youth unemployment rates.
On the other hand, those who advocate for the right to work beyond 65 emphasize the importance of individual choice and personal fulfillment. As people’s life expectancy continues to increase, many seniors may still be in good health and possess valuable skills and knowledge at the age of 65. Forcing them to retire could deprive them of the sense of purpose and identity that their careers provide. Furthermore, it may also have financial implications, as not everyone has sufficient retirement savings to maintain their desired lifestyle.
In my opinion, the decision to work beyond the age of 65 should be left up to the individual, taking into account their personal circumstances and preferences. It is essential to recognize that one size does not fit all, and people’s needs and abilities differ significantly. To ensure that everyone has the opportunity to make the best decision for their situation, it may be beneficial to adopt a more flexible approach to retirement, such as a gradual reduction in working hours or the option to switch to part-time work. This would allow older workers to maintain their sense of purpose and financial security while also giving them more time to enjoy their retirement and pursue other interests.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments in favor of both mandatory retirement at 65 and allowing individuals to work as long as they wish, I believe that a flexible and individualized approach to retirement is the most appropriate solution. This would enable older workers to strike the right balance between their personal and professional lives and ensure that they can enjoy their golden years in the manner that best suits their needs and desires.
Sample 2 Some People Say That No One Should Work After the Age of 65 Others
The debate over whether individuals should work after the age of 65 is a contentious one. Some people argue that retirement should be mandatory at 65, while others believe that individuals should have the freedom to continue working if they desire. In this essay, both viewpoints will be discussed, followed by my opinion on the matter.
Advocates for mandatory retirement at 65 argue that it can have several benefits. Firstly, as people age, their physical and cognitive abilities tend to decline, which can make it more challenging for them to perform their job duties effectively. By retiring at 65, older individuals can prioritize their health and well-being. Secondly, mandatory retirement can create job opportunities for younger generations, addressing issues such as high youth unemployment rates. Finally, retirement allows seniors to enjoy their golden years, spend time with family, and pursue personal interests, contributing to their overall happiness and quality of life.
Conversely, those in favor of working beyond 65 emphasize the importance of individual choice and personal fulfillment. Life expectancy has increased significantly, and many seniors remain healthy, skilled, and knowledgeable at 65. Forcing retirement upon them could strip them of their sense of purpose and identity tied to their careers. Additionally, financial concerns play a role, as not everyone has adequate retirement savings to maintain their desired lifestyle. Continuing to work can provide financial stability and peace of mind.
In my view, the decision to work past the age of 65 should be left to the individual, based on their personal circumstances and preferences. People’s needs and abilities differ greatly, making it essential to recognize that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable. A more flexible approach to retirement, such as a gradual reduction in working hours or offering part-time work options, could provide a better solution. This would allow older workers to maintain their sense of purpose and financial security while giving them more time to enjoy their retirement and explore other interests.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments for both mandatory retirement at 65 and allowing individuals to work as long as they desire, I believe that a flexible, individualized approach to retirement is the most appropriate solution. This would enable older workers to find the right balance between their personal and professional lives, ensuring they can enjoy their golden years in a manner that best suits their needs and preferences.